Regarding a Regress |
| |
Authors: | Yuri Cath |
| |
Affiliation: | School of Philosophy, University of East Anglia |
| |
Abstract: | Is there a successful regress argument against intellectualism? In this article I defend the negative answer. I begin by defending Stanley and Williamson's (2001) critique of the contemplation regress against Noë (2005). I then identify a new argument – the employment regress – that is designed to succeed where the contemplation regress fails, and which I take to be the most basic and plausible form of a regress argument against intellectualism. However, I argue that the employment regress still fails. Drawing on the previous discussion, I criticise further regress arguments given by Hetherington (2006) and Noë (2005). |
| |
Keywords: | |
|
|