首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
   检索      

人事选拔中作假的内涵及测量方法
引用本文:刘茜,徐建平,许诺.人事选拔中作假的内涵及测量方法[J].心理科学进展,2013,21(2):372-380.
作者姓名:刘茜  徐建平  许诺
作者单位:北京师范大学心理学院,北京市应用实验心理重点实验室,北京100875
摘    要:作假普遍存在于人事选拔各个阶段,并对最终选拔结果造成影响.研究者对于作假的内涵界定有较大差异,主要是由于研究者对作假结构、变异来源和作假水平有不同理解.根据不同作假定义可衍生出多种作假测量方法,常用的有基线差值法、认知模式法、嵌入量表法和行为模式法四类.从测量指标、次数和内容三个方面分析归纳这四类测量方法,其作假识别效用与选拔中作假测量的可行性各异.今后的研究应完善现有作假测量方法,开发作假动机测量工具,加强作假的过程性控制研究,并深入探索作假的个体差异.

关 键 词:作假  作假测量方法  人事选拔
收稿时间:2012-05-13

Implications and Measurements of Faking in Personnel Selection
LIU Qian,XU Jianping,XU Nuo.Implications and Measurements of Faking in Personnel Selection[J].Advances In Psychological Science,2013,21(2):372-380.
Authors:LIU Qian  XU Jianping  XU Nuo
Institution:(School of Psychology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing Key Lab for Applied Experimental Psychology, Beijing 100875, China)
Abstract:Faking is universal among all stages of personnel selection and will finally lead to unreliable selection. The implication of faking varies from researchers to researchers due to their different understanding of faking structure, source of variation and level of faking. Many faking measurements derive from these different definitions, among which baseline offsets, cognitive pattern, inserted scales and behavior monitoring are the most commonly used ones. In this paper, the four methods are classified in terms of indicators, frequencies and contents, whose effectiveness and practicability in personnel selection varies. Future studies should focus on improving extant methods, developing new methods to measure faking motivation, enhancing the study on procedural control of faking behavior and delving into individual differences in faking.
Keywords:faking  measurements of faking  personnel selection
本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《心理科学进展》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《心理科学进展》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号