The effects of supervisory interruptions on therapists and clients

Abstract

The general acceptance of live supervision has not been without criticism, specifically that it is a disruptive intrusion into the therapeutic process. The present study attempted to determine what effect supervisory interruptions had on the participants in a therapy session. Using a within-subjects design, excerpts from a session were analyzed to determine differences between a no-interruption condition and conditions of supervisor-initiated, therapist-initiated, and telephone interruptions. While each of the participants were affected to varying degrees by the interruptions, there were no consistent effects. It was concluded that the act of interrupting a therapeutic session, in and of itself, is not sufficiently disruptive to negate it use. Implications for supervision and practice are discussed and recommendations are given for managing interruptions during supervision and daily clinical practice.