HOW TO ANALYZE IMMEDIATE EXPERIENCE: |
| |
Authors: | SØREN OVERGAARD |
| |
Institution: | Department of Philosophy, University of Hull, Hull HU6 7RX, United KingdomS.Overgaard@hull.ac.uk |
| |
Abstract: | Abstract: This article discusses Jaakko Hintikka's interpretation of the aims and method of Husserl's phenomenology. I argue that Hintikka misrepresents Husserl's phenomenology on certain crucial points. More specifically, Hintikka misconstrues Husserl's notion of “immediate experience” and consequently fails to grasp the functions of the central methodological tools known as the “epoché” and the “phenomenological reduction.” The result is that the conception of phenomenology he attributes to Husserl is very far from realizing the philosophical potential of Husserl's position. Hence if we want a fruitful rapprochement between analytical philosophy and Continental phenomenology of the kind that is Hintikka's ultimate aim, then Hintikka's account of Husserl needs correcting on a number of crucial points. |
| |
Keywords: | epoché immediate experience Hintikka Husserl phenomenology philosophical method |
|
|