首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


DEVELOPMENT OF OBJECTIVE CRITERIA TO EVALUATE THE AUTHENTICITY OF REVELATION
Authors:Tariq Mustafa
Affiliation:Worked with the United States Atomic Energy Commission (USAEC) at Oak Ridge, Tennessee, and with NASA at their Wallop's Island Range, Virginia. He led the building of Pakistan's first rocket range and retired as Federal Secretary after heading a number of ministries of the Government of Pakistan, including the Ministry of Science and Technology. His e‐mail address is mustafatariq@hotmail.com.
Abstract:Science has been dazzlingly successful in explaining nature. Scientific advances also have led to certain undesirable, though unintended, side effects, one of which is alienation from the spiritual. Revelation comes from the Divine. But what is the status of authenticity of a particular piece claimed to be revelation? What is its historical validity and current state of preservation? This essay proposes to develop a list of rational criteria, in consultation with all stakeholders, for addressing the subject. The aim is to bring objectivity into this discourse by placing it more on the turf of reason rather than basing it on considerations of faith and prior allegiance.
Keywords:authentic revelation  Creator  evaluative framework  falsifiable statements  logical criteria  rational evidence  reason  revelation  SETI project  unfavorable side effects of science
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号