首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

全球生命伦理学:共识的瓦解(上)——对全球性道德的探求:生命伦理学,文化战争和道德多样性
引用本文:H.Tristram Engelhardt,郭玉宇,万旭,包玉颖,鲁琳,马晶,刘璟洁,许启斌,陈劲红,周煜,岳正伟,钟文娜. 全球生命伦理学:共识的瓦解(上)——对全球性道德的探求:生命伦理学,文化战争和道德多样性[J]. 医学与哲学(人文社会医学版), 2008, 29(2): 1-4,9
作者姓名:H.Tristram Engelhardt  郭玉宇  万旭  包玉颖  鲁琳  马晶  刘璟洁  许启斌  陈劲红  周煜  岳正伟  钟文娜
作者单位:[1]Rice University, Houston [2]东南大学生命伦理学研究中心, Houston
摘    要:探究道德差异的核心问题以及哪种道德意见被我们采纳,比如为了建立医疗保健伦理模式与决策方法比较传统与后传统、家族本位与个人本位之间的关系。考虑到以道德多元化定义当代人类处境,关于卫生保健政策和生命法则的反思是明智的。这个反思强调了俗世伦理学的道德多元化和为对自由和责任进行俗世化思考的结论之间分歧的意义。

关 键 词:全球道德 道德多元化 道德差异 俗世伦理学
文章编号:1002-0772(2008)2-0001-05
收稿时间:2007-12-30
修稿时间:2008-01-05

The Search for a Global Morality:Bioethics,the Culture Wars,and Moral Diversity
H.Tristram Engelhardt.Rice University,Houston. The Search for a Global Morality:Bioethics,the Culture Wars,and Moral Diversity[J]. Medicine & Philosophy:Humanistic & Social Medicine Edition, 2008, 29(2): 1-4,9
Authors:H.Tristram Engelhardt.Rice University  Houston
Abstract:To explore the axes of moral difference along which moral controversies are eonstituted, such as the contrast between traditional versus post-traditional, family-oriented versus individual-oriented approaches to health care morality and decision-making. Attention is also directed to the grounds for the ineradicable pluralism of moral views we confront. In conclusion, a brief reflection is advanced regarding health care policy and biolaw, in light of the moral pluralism that defines the contemporary human condition. This reflection underscores the watershed implications of moral pluralism for a secular morality and its radical consequences for a secular account of liberty and responsibility.
Keywords:global bioethics  moral diversity   moral difference   secular ethics
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号