首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


A CRITIQUE OF ISLAMIC ARGUMENTS ON HUMAN CLONING
Authors:by Farrokh B. Sekaleshfar
Affiliation:Medical doctor and a bioethics student at the University of Manchester School of Law. His mailing address is 6, Leycester Road, Knutsford, Cheshire WA16 8QS, U.K.;e-mail .
Abstract:Sunnism constitutes eighty percent of the Islamic world. The most academic and renowned religious seminary in the Sunni world is Al-Azhar University in Egypt, and it is from here that most verdicts on novel issues such as human cloning are decreed and disseminated throughout the Islamic and non-Islamic worlds. The perspective of this seminary and of other significant Sunni jurisprudential councils and figures are alluded to throughout this essay. I lay out the method of legal derivation employed by the Sunni clergy and scholars and then illustrate how they have arrived at their prohibition on human cloning. I demonstrate weaknesses of methodology employed by the major Sunni Muftis within the domain of jurisprudence.
Keywords:analogical deduction    ethics    human cloning    Islam    jurisprudence    slippery slope arguments    Sunnism
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号