Assessing Professional Boundaries in Clinical Settings: The Development of the Boundaries in Practice Scale |
| |
Authors: | Melissa Kendall Greg Ungerer Julianne Malt Ellen Eugarde Timothy Geraghty |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Transitional Rehabilitation Program, Queensland Spinal Cord Injuries Service;2. Acquired Brain Injuries Outreach Service;3. Griffith Health Griffith University;4. Transitional Rehabilitation Program, Queensland Spinal Cord Injuries Service;5. Spinal Injuries Unit, Queensland Spinal Cord Injuries Service |
| |
Abstract: | This article reports on the Boundaries in Practice (BIP) Scale developed to measure knowledge, comfort, ethical decision making, and experience. Few instruments used in studies conducted on professional/?client boundaries have been validated. The BIP demonstrated sound face, content and construct validity, and adequate internal consistency reliability. The BIP Scale provides the first reliable and valid means of investigating multiple boundary domains across health disciplines and teams. The sensitivity and complexity of boundary issues and the serious consequences of breaches highlight the importance of a valid and reliable measure in building empirical knowledge in this field. |
| |
Keywords: | professional boundaries ethics measurement multidisciplinary |
|