首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

可预测性和空格对中文阅读影响的眼动研究
引用本文:白学军,曹玉肖,顾俊娟,郭志英,闫国利. 可预测性和空格对中文阅读影响的眼动研究[J]. 心理科学, 2011, 34(6): 1282-1288
作者姓名:白学军  曹玉肖  顾俊娟  郭志英  闫国利
作者单位:1. 天津师范大学心理与行为研究院;2. 天津师范大学;3.
基金项目:全国教育科学“十一五”规划教育部重点项目(DBA090290); 国家自然科学基金项目(30870781)的资助
摘    要:实验采用EyeLink II 眼动仪,以30名大学生为被试,采用2(预测性:高、低)×3(空格:正常无空格、词间空格、非词空格)被试内设计,考察了预测性和空格对中文阅读影响,探讨了模块化理论和相互作用理论的争论。结果发现:词的预测性和空格两因素的主效应显著,但二者之间无交互作用,符合模块化理论的预期。

关 键 词:模块化理论  相互作用理论  预测性  空格  眼动  
收稿时间:2010-10-17

Effects of Predictability and Space on Chinese Reading:An Eye Movement Study
Bai Xuejun,Cao Yuxiao,Gu Junjuan,Guo Zhiying,Yan Guoli. Effects of Predictability and Space on Chinese Reading:An Eye Movement Study[J]. Psychological Science, 2011, 34(6): 1282-1288
Authors:Bai Xuejun  Cao Yuxiao  Gu Junjuan  Guo Zhiying  Yan Guoli
Affiliation:Bai Xuejun,Cao Yuxiao,Gu Junjuan,Guo Zhiying,Yan Guoli (Academy of Psychology and Behavior in Tianjin Normal University,Tianjin,300074)
Abstract:There is a dispute between the modularity theory and the interactive theory in language process.The modularity theory holds that language is composed of low-level factors(including word frequency,word length,phonetic information,prefix,postfix,space and so on) and high-level factors(containing syntax and semantics).They don't interact with each other in processing.Contrarily,the interactive theory maintains that they are interactive.Predictability(a high-level factor) and space(a low-level factor) are impor...
Keywords:modularity theory  interactive theory  predictability  space  eye movement  
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《心理科学》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《心理科学》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号