Feedback influences children's reasoning about math equivalence: A meta-analytic review |
| |
Authors: | Emily R. Fyfe Sarah A. Brown |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USAefyfe@indiana.edu;3. Department of Psychology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA |
| |
Abstract: | ABSTRACTDecades of research have focused on children's reasoning about math equivalence problems for both practical and theoretical insights. Not only are math equivalence problems foundational in arithmetic and algebra, they also represent a class of problems on which children's thinking is resistant to change. Feedback is one instructional tool that can serve as a key trigger of cognitive change. In this paper, we review all experimental studies (N = 8) on the effects of feedback on children's (ages 6–11) understanding of math equivalence. Meta-analytic results indicate that feedback has positive effects for low-knowledge learners and negative effects for high-knowledge learners, and these effects are stronger for procedural outcomes than conceptual outcomes. Findings highlight the variable influences of feedback on math equivalence understanding and suggest that models of thinking and reasoning need to consider learner characteristics, learning outcomes, and learning materials, as well as the dynamic interactions among them. |
| |
Keywords: | Math equivalence feedback procedural knowledge conceptual knowledge meta-analysis |
|
|