Ethics Issues with Private Research Ethics Boards: A Breakout Session at the 2009 NCEHR National Conference |
| |
Authors: | Francis Rolleston Jack Corman Serge Gauthier Paddi O’Hara Rod Schmaltz |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. National Research Council, Ottawa, ON, Canada 2. Institutional Review Board Services, Aurora, ON, Canada 3. Alzheimer and Cognitive Disorders Clinic, McGill Centre for Studies in Aging, Verdun, Canada 4. O’Hara Consulting, Ottawa, Canada 5. Department of Psychology, Grant MacEwan College, Edmonton, Canada
|
| |
Abstract: | Research Ethics Boards (REBs) provide oversight for Canadians that research projects will comply with standards of ethics if the studies are carried out as described in the documents that have been approved. While REBs have traditionally been affiliated with institutions such as universities and hospitals, a number of factors - including the increased volume of research being conducted outside academic centres - have resulted in the establishment of some private or independent REBs. This, in turn, has raised concerns about the credibility of REBs in the private sector and their capacity to handle issues around conflict of interest. This Breakout Session was an opportunity to hear the perspectives of people associated with institutional and private REBs and examine perceived problems with boards in the private sector, scrutinize theoretical and structural differences between types of REBs, and look at whether or not there is room for both institutional and private boards in the Canadian research review landscape. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|