The effects of collaborative practice on statistical problem solving: Benefits and boundaries |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. ARC Centre of Excellence in Cognition and its Disorders, Department of Cognitive Science, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia;2. Department of Psychology, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand;3. Department of Anthropology, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia;1. Primate Center and Department of Physiological Sciences, Institute of Biology, University of Brasilia, CEP 70910-900 Brasilia, DF, Brazil;2. Department of Applied Clinical and Biotechnological Sciences, University of L’Aquila, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy;3. Santa Lucia Foundation IRCCS, via del Fosso di Fiorano 65, 00143 Rome, Italy;4. Department of Psychology and Research Center “Daniel Bovet”, Sapienza University, via dei Marsi 78, 00185 Rome, Italy;5. Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Health Sciences, University of Brasilia, CEP 70910-900 Brasilia, DF, Brazil;1. Washington University in St. Louis, United States;2. Montana State University, United States;3. University of Chicago, United States;4. University of Washington, United States |
| |
Abstract: | In recent years, understanding the effects of collaboration on learning and memory has emerged as a major topic of investigation. Findings from applied educational research and from basic cognitive research demonstrate a complex view of how collaboration affects learning. The present laboratory study bridged these two domains of research to address the question of how collaborative learning affects statistical problem solving. After viewing a lecture, participants completed two statistics tests. They either completed the tests collaboratively and then individually, or completed both tests individually. Results showed an immediate benefit of collaboration, but this benefit did not persist on a subsequent individual test. Repeated practice by those who worked individually increased performance to the level of those who had previously collaborated. These results were qualified by gender as females showed a consistent benefit from prior collaboration on the post-collaborative test, particularly on conceptual problems. Implications for education are discussed. |
| |
Keywords: | Collaboration Memory Learning Statistics Repeated practice |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|