Philosophical intervention and cross-disciplinary science: the story of the Toolbox Project |
| |
Authors: | Michael O’Rourke Stephen J. Crowley |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Department of Philosophy, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, 48824-1032, USA 2. Department of Philosophy, Boise State University, Boise, ID, USA
|
| |
Abstract: | In this article we argue that philosophy can facilitate improvement in cross-disciplinary science. In particular, we discuss in detail the Toolbox Project, an effort in applied epistemology that deploys philosophical analysis for the purpose of enhancing collaborative, cross-disciplinary scientific research through improvements in cross-disciplinary communication. We begin by sketching the scientific context within which the Toolbox Project operates, a context that features a growing interest in and commitment to cross-disciplinary research (CDR). We then develop an argument for the leading idea behind this effort, namely, that philosophical dialogue can improve cross-disciplinary science by effecting epistemic changes that lead to better group communication. On the heels of this argument, we describe our approach and its output; in particular, we emphasize the Toolbox instrument that generates philosophical dialogue and the Toolbox workshop in which that dialogue takes place. Together, these constitute a philosophical intervention into the life of CDR teams. We conclude by considering the philosophical implications of this intervention. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|