首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
   检索      


Individual glance strategies and their effect on the NHTSA visual manual distraction test
Institution:1. Volvo Car Corporation, SE-405 31 Göteborg, Sweden;2. Luleå University of Technology, SE-971 87 Luleå, Sweden;1. Transportation Research Institute, Hasselt University, Wetenschapspark 5, Bus 6, BE-3590 Diepenbeek, Belgium;2. Faculty of Applied Engineering Sciences, Hasselt University, Agoralaan – Building H, BE-3590 Diepenbeek, Belgium;1. Department of Civil Engineering, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam Road, Hong Kong, China;2. Department of Civil and Natural Resources Engineering, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand;3. Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education – Urban Transportation Complex Systems Theory and Technology, School of Traffic and Transportation, Beijing Jiaotong University, China
Abstract:The purpose of this paper was to investigate how individual differences in glance strategy could impact the glance performance test defined in the NHTSA visual manual distraction guidelines. Better understanding of the test procedure could help development of new technology for safe driving. A custom in-vehicle information system was developed and assessed in a driving simulator by eighteen participants. The interfaces were designed according to recommendations in the NHTSA guidelines and contained manual radio-tuning tasks, sound settings tasks and six letter spelling tasks. Two of the six tested interfaces fully complied with the test. In addition, clear individual differences in glance strategy were found among the participants. Four individual glance strategies were identified. Two of these, long glancers and frequent glancers, highly affected the outcome of the compliance test. Participants belonging to the long glancers and the frequent glancers categories were identified as statistical outliers in many test cases. For example, if the individual values of these participants were replaced with sample mean, the number of complying interfaces would increase to five out of six, which is more in line with expectations for these interfaces. The results of this study show that individual variations in glance strategy exist. Also, these individual variations seem to have a non- negligible influence on the result when performance-testing of in-vehicle interfaces is done according to the NTHSA guidelines.
Keywords:Individual differences  Driving simulator testing  Distraction guidelines  Glance behaviour  Design of in-vehicle technology
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号