More than One Flaw: Reply to Millican |
| |
Authors: | Graham Oppy |
| |
Affiliation: | (1) School of Philosophy and Bioethics, Monash University, Clayton Campus, Wellington Road, Clayton, VIC, 3800, Australia |
| |
Abstract: | Millican (Mind 113(451):437–476, 2004) claims to have detected ‘the one fatal flaw in Anselm’s ontological argument.’ I argue that there is more than one important flaw in the position defended in Millican (Mind 113(451):437–476, 2004). First, Millican’s reconstruction of Anselm’s argument does serious violence to the original text. Second, Millican’s generalised objection fails to diagnose any flaw in a vast range of ontological arguments. Third, there are independent reasons for thinking that Millican’s generalised objection is unpersuasive. |
| |
Keywords: | Ontological argument Anselm Proslogion Non-existent objects |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|