Human and machine: Evaluating whether action automation influences visual perception |
| |
Authors: | Tenhundfeld Nathan L. Witt Jessica K. |
| |
Affiliation: | 1.Department of Psychology, University of Alabama in Huntsville, Huntsville, AL, USA ;2.Department of Psychology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA ; |
| |
Abstract: | The action-specific account of perception suggests that our perceptual system is influenced by information about our ability to act in our environment and, thus, affects our perception. However, the specific information about action that is influential for perception is still largely unknown. For example, if a goal is achieved through automation rather than action, is perception influenced because the goal was achieved or is perception immune because the act was automated rather than performed by the observer? In four experiments, we examined whether automating a paddle to block a moving ball in a computer game similar to Pong affects perception of the ball’s speed. Results indicate that the automation used here did not affect speed perception of the target. Whereas tools such as reach-extending sticks and various-sized paddles are both incorporated into one’s body schema and also influence spatial perception, automation, our results imply that automation is not incorporated into one’s body schema and does not affect spatial perception. The dissociation in how the mind treats tools versus automation could have several implications as automation becomes more prevalent in daily life. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|