首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

罗夏墨迹技术的近期发展与争论
引用本文:郭庆科,王炜丽,戚菲,陈雪霞. 罗夏墨迹技术的近期发展与争论[J]. 心理科学进展, 2008, 16(6): 973-980. DOI:  
作者姓名:郭庆科  王炜丽  戚菲  陈雪霞
作者单位:辽宁师范大学心理系,大连 116029
摘    要:综合系统在罗夏墨迹技术(RIM)的标准化、客观化方面取得了很大的成功,但仍有一些批评者对它的信度、效度、常模与标准化等问题提出了质疑,作者们对这些争论的焦点问题进行了系统的回顾。总结有关的元分析和实验研究,发现RIM的多数核心变量都有较好的评分者信度和跨时间稳定性,只有心理状态变量的信度较低。以往的整体元分析和局部元分析都发现RIM不逊于其他测验。这些结果表明RIM在临床疾病诊断,外显行为预测方面都是有价值的。与其他 测验一样,RIM也有其优势与不足,在应用中应与其他测验互补

关 键 词:罗夏墨迹技术  效度  信度  常模与标准化  
收稿时间:2007-10-30

Recent Development and Controversies of Rorschach Ink-Blot Method
GUO Qing-Ke WANG Wei-Li QI Fei CHEN Xue-Xia. Recent Development and Controversies of Rorschach Ink-Blot Method[J]. Advances In Psychological Science, 2008, 16(6): 973-980. DOI:  
Authors:GUO Qing-Ke WANG Wei-Li QI Fei CHEN Xue-Xia
Affiliation:Department of Psychology, Liaoning Normal University, Dalian 116029, China
Abstract:The Comprehensive System has obtained successes in standardization and objectification of Rorschach Ink-Blot Method, but many critics of RIM suspect its reliability, validity, norm and standardization, while advocates of RIM provide testimony to support its properties. Authors of this paper systematically reviewed focuses of the controversies about RIM and summarized relevant Meta-Analyses and experimental researches. The results showed that core variables of RIM have high level of rater’s reliability and temporal stability, only conditional variables manifested low level reliability; Focused and Global Meta-Analyses found that the RIM scores have higher validity than other tests variables. Based on above reviews we concluded that RIM has values in clinical diagnosis and overt behavior prediction. The same as other tests, RIM also has its strengths and weaknesses, It should integrate with other tests in application
Keywords:Rorschach Ink-Blot Method  validity  reliability  norm and standardization
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《心理科学进展》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《心理科学进展》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号