首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
   检索      


Exposing Clinicians to Exposure: A Randomized Controlled Dissemination Trial of Exposure Therapy for Anxiety Disorders
Institution:1. Department of Psychology and Institute for Mental Health Research, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin;2. Department of Psychology, Southern Methodist University, Dallas, TX;3. Department of Psychology, Boston University, Boston, MA;4. Department of Psychiatry, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC;5. Department of Mathematics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN;1. University of Colorado Boulder, Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, 345 UCB Muenzinger, Boulder, CO 80309-0345, United States;2. Utah State University, Department of Psychology, 2810 Old Main Hill, Logan, UT 84322-2810, United States;3. School of Psychology, University of Wollongong, Northfields Avenue, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia;1. Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Mayo Clinic, United States;2. Department of Psychology, University of Wollongong, Australia;3. Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University and Bradley Hospital, United States
Abstract:ObjectiveThe present study evaluated three technology-based methods of training mental health providers in exposure therapy (ET) for anxiety disorders. Training methods were designed to address common barriers to the dissemination of ET, including limited access to training, negative clinician attitudes toward ET, and lack of support during and following training.MethodClinicians naïve to ET (N = 181, Mage = 37.4, 71.3% female, 72.1% Caucasian) were randomly assigned to (a) an interactive, multimedia online training (OLT), (b) OLT plus a brief, computerized motivational enhancement intervention (OLT + ME), or (c) OLT + ME plus a Web-based learning community (OLT + ME + LC). Assessments were completed at baseline, posttraining, and 6 and 12 weeks following training. Outcomes include satisfaction, knowledge, self-efficacy, attitudes, self-reported clinical use, and observer-rated clinical proficiency.ResultsAll three training methods led to large and comparable improvements in self-efficacy and clinical use of ET, indicating that OLT alone was sufficient for improving these outcomes. The addition of the ME intervention did not significantly improve outcomes in comparison to OLT alone. Supplementing the OLT with both the ME intervention and the LC significantly improved attitudes and clinical proficiency in comparison to OLT alone. The OLT + ME + LC condition was superior to both other conditions in increasing knowledge of ET.ConclusionsMulticomponent trainings that address multiple potential barriers to dissemination appear to be most effective in improving clinician outcomes. Technology-based training methods offer a satisfactory, effective, and scalable way to train mental health providers in evidence-based treatments such as ET.
Keywords:
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号