首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Measurement of External Shame: An Inside View
Authors:Michela Balsamo  Antonella Macchia  Leonardo Carlucci  Laura Picconi  Marco Tommasi  Paul Gilbert
Affiliation:1. Department of Psychological Sciences, Humanities and Territory, G. d’Annunzio University, Chieti, Italymichela.balsamo@libero.it;3. Department of Psychological Sciences, Humanities and Territory, G. d’Annunzio University, Chieti, Italy;4. Mental Health Research Unit, Kingsway Hospital, University of Derby, United Kingdom
Abstract:The aims of this study were to investigate the construct validity of the Other as Shamer scale (OAS) using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and to examine the psychometric properties of its Italian version in a sample of 687 nonclinical individuals. The CFA results indicated that the hypothesized hierarchical model (with 1 higher order factor and 3 first-order factors) was the best fitting solution. Cronbach's alpha indexes, as well as test–retest stability, provided satisfactory results. Correlations of the OAS total score and its subscales with the Beck Depression Inventory–II (rs = .30–.48) and the Teate Depression Inventory (rs = .32–.45) were both substantial and significant (p < .01). Receiver operating characteristic curves were constructed to indicate sensitivity and specificity of the OAS and its subscales when determining those nonclinical subjects who met clinical thresholds for depression symptoms. A series of cutoff scores for the OAS scale and its subscales was developed, with sensitivity values between .70 and .62, and specificity values between .71 and .62, indicating good to fair discrimination between the 2 groups (depressed vs. nondepressed). The theoretical and practical implications of these results were discussed.
Keywords:
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号