The integration of science and practice: Unique perspectives from counseling psychology students |
| |
Authors: | Saarah D. Kison Kayla D. Moorer Margo C. Villarosa |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Psychology, University of Southern Mississippi, Hattiesburg, MS, USAsaarah.kison@eagles.usm.edu;3. Psychology, University of Southern Mississippi, Hattiesburg, MS, USA |
| |
Abstract: | Counseling psychology training programs predominately subscribe to the scientist–practitioner training model, which emphasizes the mutual integration of science and practice. There has been extensive debate surrounding the applicability of the scientist–practitioner training model to the field of counseling psychology, and existing commentary from both trainers and trainees has documented the potential challenges to adequately integrating science and practice. In the current article, three counseling psychology doctoral students outline their experiences in a program that adheres to the scientist–practitioner training model. In particular, they describe their involvement in both clinical and scholarly related activities, their experiences with the integration of science and practice, and how the scientist–practitioner model has influenced their overall professional development. Specific examples of how the scientist–practitioner model can shape the perspectives and career goals of psychologists-in-training are reviewed. |
| |
Keywords: | scientist–practitioner model counseling psychology training student perspectives Boulder model |
|
|