How perpetrators and targets construe knowledge hiding in organizations |
| |
Authors: | Catherine E. Connelly David Zweig |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. DeGroote School of Business, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canadaconnell@mcmaster.ca;3. Department of Management, University of Toronto Scarborough, Toronto, ON, Canada |
| |
Abstract: | Research has begun to document the negative organizational consequences of knowledge hiding, or the intentional attempt to conceal knowledge, among employees. However, different knowledge hiding behaviours exist, and we explore whether some types of knowledge hiding are more harmful than others. Although theory would suggest that knowledge hiders rationalize their behaviours and fail to anticipate the negative consequences of their behaviours, we found that they did anticipate harmed relationships and retaliation. In addition, targets of knowledge hiding did not always construe the behaviour as harmful or as necessitating retaliation. Overall, our research suggests that not all knowledge hiding is equally harmful. Some types of knowledge hiding may actually enhance the relationships between colleagues and might break the cycle of knowledge hiding in organizations. |
| |
Keywords: | Knowledge hiding Knowledge sharing Social construals Interpersonal relationships |
|
|