Neural representationalism,the Hard Problem of Content and vitiated verdicts. A reply to Hutto & Myin (2013) |
| |
Authors: | Matteo Colombo |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Tilburg Center for Logic, General Ethics, and Philosophy of Science (TiLPS), Tilburg University, P.O. Box 90153, 5000 LE, Tilburg, The Netherlands
|
| |
Abstract: | Colombo’s (Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 2013) plea for neural representationalism is the focus of a recent contribution to Phenomenology and Cognitive Science by Daniel D. Hutto and Erik Myin. In that paper, Hutto and Myin have tried to show that my arguments fail badly. Here, I want to respond to their critique clarifying the type of neural representationalism put forward in my (Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 2013) piece, and to take the opportunity to make a few remarks of general interest concerning what Hutto and Myin have dubbed “the Hard Problem of Content.” |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|