Feedback on health status and peer popularity influences social risk decision-making processes in adolescents and young adults |
| |
| Authors: | Ivan Padrón Maria Jose Rodrigo Manuel De Vega |
| |
| Affiliation: | 1. Faculty of Psychology, Dpt. Developmental Psychology and Education, University of La Laguna Campus de Guajara, La Laguna, Spain;2. Faculty of Psychology, Dpt. Cognitive Psychology, University of La Laguna Campus de Guajara, La Laguna, Spain |
| |
| Abstract: | Cognitive and dual-processes models, involving cognitive and socio-emotional components, for adolescents’ risky behaviour have been proposed. This study tested their predictions by manipulating the presence or absence of feedback about gains and losses in health and peer popularity in a decision-making task with peers. Risky (e.g., taking or refusing a drug) and ambiguous decisions (e.g., eating hamburger or hotdog) were examined in 256 adolescents (aged 13–14; 15–16; 17–18) and young adults (aged 19–20). Participants made more risky choices and required less decision time when receiving feedback about the negative consequences on health and positive consequences on peer popularity. Decision times were comparatively larger for risky than for safe options in late adolescence and young adulthood. Results supported the dual-processes model showing that, though late cognitive changes were observed that could eventually lead to the selection of safe options, feedback gains in peer popularity outweighed unhealthy consequences leading to risky decisions. |
| |
| Keywords: | Risk decision-making process peer popularity feedback health feedback adolescence young adulthood |
|
|
