Comparison of DSM-III-R chronic major depression and major depression superimposed on dysthymia (double depression): validity of the distinction |
| |
Authors: | McCullough J P Klein D N Keller M B Holzer C E Davis S M Kornstein S G Howland R H Thase M E Harrison W M |
| |
Affiliation: | Department of Psychology, Virginia Commonwealth University 23284-2018, USA. |
| |
Abstract: | The nosology of chronic depression has become increasingly complex since the publication of the revised third edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-III-R; American Psychiatric Association, 1987), but there are few data available to evaluate the validity of the distinctions between the subtypes of chronic depression. The validity of the distinction between DSM-III-R chronic major depression (CMD) and major depression superimposed on dysthymia (double depression, DD) was examined. Participants were 635 patients with chronic depression in a 12-week trial of antidepressant medications. Patients with CMD, DD, and a 3rd group with a chronic major depressive episode superimposed on dysthymia (DD/CMD) were compared on demographic and clinical characteristics, family history, and response to treatment. Few differences were evident, although the depression of patients with DD/CMD tended to be more severe. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 PubMed 等数据库收录! |
|