首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
   检索      


Comparison of DSM-III-R chronic major depression and major depression superimposed on dysthymia (double depression): validity of the distinction
Authors:McCullough J P  Klein D N  Keller M B  Holzer C E  Davis S M  Kornstein S G  Howland R H  Thase M E  Harrison W M
Institution:Department of Psychology, Virginia Commonwealth University 23284-2018, USA.
Abstract:The nosology of chronic depression has become increasingly complex since the publication of the revised third edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-III-R; American Psychiatric Association, 1987), but there are few data available to evaluate the validity of the distinctions between the subtypes of chronic depression. The validity of the distinction between DSM-III-R chronic major depression (CMD) and major depression superimposed on dysthymia (double depression, DD) was examined. Participants were 635 patients with chronic depression in a 12-week trial of antidepressant medications. Patients with CMD, DD, and a 3rd group with a chronic major depressive episode superimposed on dysthymia (DD/CMD) were compared on demographic and clinical characteristics, family history, and response to treatment. Few differences were evident, although the depression of patients with DD/CMD tended to be more severe.
Keywords:
本文献已被 PubMed 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号