首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


How choice of mouse may affect response timing in psychological studies
Authors:Richard?R.?Plant  author-information"  >  author-information__contact u-icon-before"  >  mailto:r.plant@psych.york.ac.uk"   title="  r.plant@psych.york.ac.uk"   itemprop="  email"   data-track="  click"   data-track-action="  Email author"   data-track-label="  "  >Email author,Nick?Hammond,Tom?Whitehouse
Affiliation:(1) DSBTA - Section of Human Physiology, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy;(2) RBCS - Robotics, Brain and Cognitive Sciences Department, IIT - The Italian Institute of Technology, Genoa, Italy
Abstract:Mice from the early 1990s seemed to offer a cheap and viable alternative to more expensive response boxes, with fairly consistent results being found between studies. However, has anything changed in the intervening decade? Are newer mice technologies necessarily better? Is USB a better mouse interface than the old-fashioned serial interface? With such questions in mind, we outline a method for bench-testing the timing characteristics of mice outside of a PC, in order to predict their contribution to response timing. A sample set of mice was testedunder a visual stimulus—response paradigm, using E-Prime to compare predicted performance with measured response registration. A representative range of mice technologies was tested alongside a standard keyboard and an E-Prime deluxe response box. The implications for using any response device other than a recognized response box are discussed.
Keywords:
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号