Intentions,Intending, and Belief: Noninferential Weak Cognitivism |
| |
Authors: | Philip Clark |
| |
Affiliation: | Department of Philosophy, University of Toronto |
| |
Abstract: | Cognitivists about intention hold that intending to do something entails believing you will do it. Noncognitivists hold that intentions are conative states with no cognitive component. I argue that both of these claims are true. Intending entails the presence of a belief, even though the intention is not even partly the belief. The result is a form of what Sarah Paul calls noninferential weak cognitivism, a view that, as she notes, has no prominent defenders. |
| |
Keywords: | |
|
|