The irreversibility of death: reply to Cole |
| |
Authors: | Tomlinson T |
| |
Affiliation: | Center for Ethics and Humanities in the Life Sciences, Michigan State University. |
| |
Abstract: | Professor Cole is correct in his conclusion that the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC) protocol does not violate requirements of "irreversibility" in criteria of death, but wrong about the reasons. "Irreversible" in this context is best understood not as an ontological or epistemic term, but as an ethical one. Understood that way, the patient declared dead under the protocol is "irreversibly" so, even though resuscitation by medical means is still possible. Nonetheless, the protocol revives difficult questions about our concept of death. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 PubMed 等数据库收录! |
|