Ought implies can,asymmetrical freedom,and the practical irrelevance of transcendental freedom |
| |
Authors: | Matth Scholten |
| |
Affiliation: | Matthé Scholten |
| |
Abstract: | In this paper, I demonstrate that Kant's commitment to an asymmetry between the control conditions for praise and blame is explained by his endorsement of the principle Ought Implies Can (OIC). I argue that Kant accepts only a relatively weak version of OIC and that he is hence committed only to a relatively weak requirement of alternate possibilities for moral blame. This suggests that whether we are transcendentally free is irrelevant to questions about moral permissibility and moral blameworthiness. |
| |
Keywords: | |
|
|