|
|||||
|
|
A Short Refutation of Strict Normative Evidentialism |
|
| Authors: | Andrew E. Reisner |
| Affiliation: | 1. McGill University, Canadaandrew.reisner@mcgill.ca |
| Abstract: | This paper shows that strict evidentialism about normative reasons for belief is inconsistent with taking truth to be the source of normative reasons for belief. It does so by showing that there are circumstances in which one can know what truth requires one to believe, yet still lack evidence for the contents of that belief. |
| Keywords: | |