The role of some definite references in linguistic integration |
| |
Authors: | E. Eugene Schultz Michael L. Kamil |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Department of Psychology, Milligan College, 37682, Milligan College, Tennessee 2. Purdue University, 47907, Lafayette, Indiana
|
| |
Abstract: | Definite reference increases thematic integration for semantically related sentences (DeVilliers, 1974). Therefore, definite reference should increase linguistic integration in the Bransford-Franks integrated recognition paradigm. Two recognition and two recall studies demonstrated that, if anything, indefinite reference increases linguistic integration effects, as measured by existing measures of integration. However, definite reference increases topical clustering in recall. Results cast doubt on the validity of existing measures of linguistic integration and indicate that the tally model of performance in integrated recognition tasks (Reitman & Bower, 1973) is not totally adequate, either. Results are compatible with the associative model of Anderson and Bower (1973). Topical clustering appears to be a better measure of integrated memory than are existing measures of linguistic integration. Retention of information about the propositional form in which semantically related sentences are presented and integrated memory are not necessarily incompatible. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|