How Berkeley's Gardener Knows His Cherry Tree |
| |
Authors: | Kenneth L. Pearce |
| |
Affiliation: | Department of PhilosophyTrinity College |
| |
Abstract: | The defense of common sense in Berkeley's Three Dialogues is, first and foremost, a defense of the gardener's claim to know his cherry tree, a claim threatened by both Cartesian and Lockean philosophy. This defense depends on the esse is percipi thesis (EIP). EIP is not something the gardener believes; rather, it is a philosophical analysis of the rules he unreflectively follows in his use of the word ‘exists’. Uncovering these connections between Berkeley's epistemology and philosophy of language will clarify Berkeley's strategy for bringing his reader back to common sense and practical engagement in the ordinary affairs of life. |
| |
Keywords: | |
|
|