Comparison of magneto-and electroencephalographic techniques in event-related response research—a brief survey

Event-related brain potentials are widely used in psychophysiological and neurophysiological research. Recently it has become possible to record weak magnetic fields associated with the electric events of the human brain. In this short survey the magnetoencephalo-graphic (MEG) techniques are compared with the conventional electric measures. MEG and EEG are sensitive to current sources of different orientation. Extracerebral tissues smear and damp the electric potentials but they do not have any significant effect on the magnetic fields. EEG measures potential differences whereas the actual current paths determine the magnetic fields measured outside the skull. In general MEG provides better spatial resolution than the electric recordings, as far as the cortical sources are concerned. It is concluded that EEG and MEG are complementary noninvasive techniques in brain research. As an example slow EEG and MEG shifts preceding voluntary foot movements are compared.