首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
   检索      

情绪启动条件下三种反刍思维类型的注意偏向
引用本文:杨宏飞,黎,松,陈滋正,李慧中.情绪启动条件下三种反刍思维类型的注意偏向[J].心理学探新,2020,0(1):30-35.
作者姓名:杨宏飞      陈滋正  李慧中
作者单位:(浙江大学心理与行为科学系,杭州 310028)
摘    要:目的:探讨积极型、消极型和低型反刍思维者对不同情绪刺激的注意偏向。方法:采用积极和消极反刍思维量表区分三种反刍思维类型的大学生,以情绪面孔(高兴,中性,悲伤)图片为实验材料,采用“空间线索任务”实验范式,探讨不同反刍思维类型个体注意偏向特点。结果:无启动条件下,三种类型都未产生注意偏向。积极情绪启动条件下,积极型和低型产生对积极刺激的注意警觉,消极型产生对消极刺激的注意警觉和注意解脱困难。消极启动条件下,三种类型都产生对积极刺激的注意警觉,且积极型的警觉水平高于低型和消极型。结论:积极和消极启动对三种反刍思维类型注意偏向的影响不完全符合情绪一致性效应。

关 键 词:反刍思维  积极型  消极型  低型  注意偏向

 The Attentional Biases of Three Types of Ruminators under Emotional Priming
Yang Hongfei Li Song Chen Zizhen Li Huizhong. The Attentional Biases of Three Types of Ruminators under Emotional Priming[J].Exploration of Psychology,2020,0(1):30-35.
Authors:Yang Hongfei Li Song Chen Zizhen Li Huizhong
Institution:(Department of Psychology and Behavioral Sciences,Zhejiang University,Hangzhou 310028)
Abstract:Objective:To examine the attentional biases of positive,negative and non-ruminators.Methods:To identify three types of ruminators by using the Positive and Negative Rumination Scale.To examine the attentional biases with the spatial cuing task using happy,neutral and sad faces as cues.Results:Without emotional priming,no attentional biases were found.With positive emotional priming,the positive and low ruminators showed attentional engagement towards happy cues whereas the negative ruminators showed both attentional engagement and disengagement towards sad cues.With negative emotional priming,all three types of ruminators showed attentional engagement towards sad cues.Conclusion:The effects of positive and negative emotional priming on attentional bias of three types of ruminators were not totally consistent with the mood concurrent effect.
Keywords:rumination  positive ruminators  negative ruminators  non-ruminators  attentinal bias
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《心理学探新》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《心理学探新》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号