Not all same-different discriminations are created equal: Evidence contrary to a unidimensional account of same-different learning |
| |
Authors: | Brett M Gibson Edward A Wasserman |
| |
Institution: | a The University of Iowa, USA b Tufts University, USA |
| |
Abstract: | In Experiment 1, we trained four pigeons to concurrently discriminate displays of 16 same icons (16S) from displays of 16 different icons (16D) as well as between displays of same icons (16S) from displays that contained 15 same icons and one different icon (15S:1D). The birds rapidly learned to discriminate 16S vs. 16D displays, but they failed to learn to discriminate 16S vs. 15S:1D displays. In Experiment 2, the same pigeons acquired the 16S vs. 15S:1D task after being required to locate and peck at the odd-item in the 15S:1D displays. Acquisition of the 16S vs. 15S:1D task had little effect on discriminative performance in the concurrent 16S:16D task, suggesting that a unidimensional entropy explanation for mastery of these two same-different tasks is not viable. During testing, the birds transferred discriminative performance in both tasks to displays composed of different visual stimuli. Such concurrent discrimination learning, performance, and transfer suggest that pigeons are flexible in the way they process the displays seen in these two same-different tasks. |
| |
Keywords: | Catagorical learning Same-diffferent discrimination Entropy Oddity Concepts |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|