Where Philosophy and Literature merge in the Platonic dialogues |
| |
Authors: | Livio Rossetti |
| |
Affiliation: | (1) Istituto di Filosofia/MAG, Università di Perugia, 06100 Perugia MAG, Italy |
| |
Abstract: | It is no surprise if a good quality communication unit succeeds in seizing the attention of the intended audience (or readership) and is able to let people see precisely what the author wanted them to see, while avoiding that the average addressee become aware of what the author wants to convey in an almost subliminal way. In this respect Plato is no exception. Nevertheless the study of these resources, far from having been somewhat systematic, still is largely neglected, and only a minority of commentators find it important to pay head to the communicational strategies which are at work in Plato's dialogues. It will be argued that the shades of meaning and the contextualization of thought (a) systematically grant to Plato ample room for affecting the way a reader comes to perceive his points of doctrine and (b) often let him convey a biased perception of his arguments.The paper includes an outline of the already longstanding debate on these matters, a case study (Memo 80–82), and a sketchy typology of how the literary working-out is able to affect the reader's perception of the line of thought, esp. within the aporetic dialogues. |
| |
Keywords: | Plato dialogues driven reading strategies of concealment diegetical frame contextualization of thought methods of interpretation Analytic School Tubingue School Straussian School |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|