Multiple processes in prospective memory retrieval: factors determining monitoring versus spontaneous retrieval |
| |
Authors: | Einstein Gilles O McDaniel Mark A Thomas Ruthann Mayfield Sara Shank Hilary Morrisette Nova Breneiser Jennifer |
| |
Affiliation: | Department of Psychology, Furman University, Greenville, SC 29613, USA. gil.einstein@furman.edu |
| |
Abstract: | Theoretically, prospective memory retrieval can be accomplished either by controlled monitoring of the environment for a target event or by a more reflexive process that spontaneously responds to the presence of a target event. These views were evaluated in Experiments 1-4 by examining whether performing a prospective memory task produced costs on the speed of performing the ongoing task. In Experiment 5, the authors directly tested for the existence of spontaneous retrieval. The results supported the multiprocess theory (M. A. McDaniel & G. O. Einstein, 2000) predictions that (a) spontaneous retrieval can occur and can support good prospective memory and (b) depending on task demands and individual differences, people rely to different degrees on monitoring versus spontaneous retrieval for prospective remembering. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 PubMed 等数据库收录! |
|