首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


No One Likes a Snitch
Authors:Barbara?Redman  author-information"  >  author-information__contact u-icon-before"  >  mailto:bkredman@comcast.net"   title="  bkredman@comcast.net"   itemprop="  email"   data-track="  click"   data-track-action="  Email author"   data-track-label="  "  >Email author,Arthur?Caplan
Affiliation:1.Division of Medical Ethics,NYU Langone Medical Center,New York,USA;2.Drs. William F and Virginia Connolly Mitty Chair, Division of Medical Ethics,NYU Langone Medical Center,New York,USA
Abstract:Whistleblowers remain essential as complainants in allegations of research misconduct. Frequently internal to the research team, they are poorly protected from acts of retribution, which may deter the reporting of misconduct. In order to perform their important role, whistleblowers must be treated fairly. Draft regulations for whistleblower protection were published for public comment almost a decade ago but never issued (Dahlberg 2013). In the face of the growing challenge of research fraud, we suggest vigorous steps, to include: organizational responsibility to certify the accuracy of research including audit, required whistleblower action in the face of imminent or grave harm to subjects, strengthened legal protections against retaliation including prompt enactment of Federal whistleblower protections and consideration of criminalizing the most egregious cases of research misconduct.
Keywords:
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号