Short-term retention of visually presented stimuli: some evidence of visual encoding.

Subjects saw two visual stimuli on each trial, separated by an interval ranging from 0 to 8 sec. Each stimulus was composed of a subset of the dots of a 7 × 5 dot matrix. In particular, it was a composite of two patterns, one of which formed a capital English letter and the other of which was an arrangement formed by 8 randomly selected dots. The task was to decide as quickly as possible whether the two stimuli contained the same letter. Under one condition (correlated noise) the same noise pattern was used with both letters; thus the decision as to whether the letters were the same could be based on a test of congruence of the two stimuli, noise and all. Under another condition (uncorrelated noise) the noise patterns differed, assuring that the composite patterns differed, and thus precluding congruence testing as an adequate way to determine whether the two letters were the same. Performance was better (RTs and error rates were smaller) with the correlated noise than with the uncorrelated noise. The result was taken as evidence that visual information was retained in memory, and used to advantage, when the situation clearly warranted the direct comparison of visual patterns.