首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


The Contribution of Metacognitions and Attentional Control to Decisional Procrastination
Authors:Bruce A. Fernie  Ann-Marie McKenzie  Ana V. Nikčević  Gabriele Caselli  Marcantonio M. Spada
Affiliation:1.Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience,King’s College London,London,UK;2.Cascaid,South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust,London,UK;3.Division of Psychology, School of Applied Sciences,London South Bank University,London,UK;4.Department of Psychology,Kingston University,Kingston upon Thames,UK;5.Studi Cognitivi,Milan,Italy;6.Sigmund Freud University,Milano,Italy
Abstract:Earlier research has implicated metacognitions and attentional control in procrastination and self-regulatory failure. This study tested several hypotheses: (1) that metacognitions would be positively correlated with decisional procrastination; (2) that attentional control would be negatively correlated with decisional procrastination; (3) that metacognitions would be negatively correlated with attentional control; and (4) that metacognitions and attentional control would predict decisional procrastination when controlling for negative affect. One hundred and twenty-nine participants completed the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale 21, the Meta-Cognitions Questionnaire 30, the Attentional Control Scale, and the Decisional Procrastination Scale. Significant relationships were found between all three attentional control factors (focusing, shifting, and flexible control of thought) and two metacognitions factors (negative beliefs concerning thoughts about uncontrollability and danger, and cognitive confidence). Results also revealed that decisional procrastination was significantly associated with negative affect, all measured metacognitions factors, and all attentional control factors. In the final step of a hierarchical regression analysis only stress, cognitive confidence, and attention shifting were independent predictors of decisional procrastination. Overall these findings support the hypotheses and are consistent with the Self-Regulatory Executive Function model of psychological dysfunction. The implications of these findings are discussed.
Keywords:
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号