Selling Yourself: Titmuss's Argument Against a Market in Blood |
| |
Authors: | David Archard |
| |
Affiliation: | (1) Department of Moral Philosophy, University of St Andrews, St. Andrews, Fife, KY16 9AL, UK |
| |
Abstract: | This article defends Richard Titmuss's argument, and PeterSinger's sympathetic support for it, against orthodoxphilosophical criticism. The article specifies thesense in which a market in blood is ``dehumanising' ashaving to do with a loss of ``imagined community' orsocial ``integration', and not with a loss of valued or``deeper' liberty. It separates two ``domino arguments'– the ``contamination of meaning' argument and the``erosion of motivation' argument which support, indifferent but interrelated ways, the claim that amarket in blood is ``imperialistic.' Concentrating onthe first domino argument the article considers theview that monetary and non-monetary meanings of thesame good can co-exist given the robustness of certainkinds of relationship and joint undertakings withinwhich gifts can figure. It argues that societalrelationships are vulnerable or permeable to theeffects of the market in a way that those constitutiveof the personal sphere are not.General, more broadly political questions remainunanswered but the core of Titmuss's original andchallenging argument remains and can be presented ina defensible form. |
| |
Keywords: | altruism blood domino argument Eric Mack gift imagined community market personal attributes Peter Singer Richard Titmuss |
本文献已被 PubMed SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|