|
|||||
|
|
The egocentric nature of procedural justice: Social value orientation as moderator of reactions to decision-making procedures |
|
| Authors: | Jan-Willem van Prooijen David De Cremer Tomas Ståhl Paul AM Van Lange |
| Institution: | a Department of Social Psychology, VU University Amsterdam, Van der Boechorststraat 1, 1081 BT Amsterdam, The Netherlands b Department of Social Psychology, Center of Justice and Social Decision Making (JuST), Tilburg University, P.O. Box 90153, 5000 LE, Tilburg, The Netherlands c Department of Social and Organizational Psychology, Leiden University, Wassenaarseweg 52, 2333 AK, Leiden, The Netherlands d Department of Psychology, Open University of the Netherlands, P.O. Box 2960, 6401 DL, Heerlen, The Netherlands |
| Abstract: | In four studies, the authors investigated the individual-oriented versus social-oriented nature of procedural justice effects by comparing fairness-based responses to decision-making procedures among proself versus prosocial oriented individuals. In Studies 1 through 3, we measured participants’ social value orientation and manipulated whether or not they were granted or denied voice in a decision-making process. Results consistently revealed that the effects of voice versus no-voice on fairness-based perceptions, emotions, and behavioral intentions were significantly more pronounced for individuals with proself orientations than for individuals with prosocial orientations. These findings were extended in Study 4, a field study in which perceived procedural justice was a stronger predictor of satisfaction and organizational citizenship behaviors among proselfs than among prosocials. These findings suggest that procedural justice effects can be accounted for by self-oriented motives or needs, rather than prosocial motives that are often conceptualized as being associated with justice. |
| Keywords: | Procedural justice Social value orientation Social decision making Egocentrism |
| 本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录！ | |