Causal uncertainty and metacognitive inferences about goal attainment |
| |
Authors: | Jill A. Jacobson Gifford Weary Y. Sharon Lin |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Queen's University , Kingston, Ontario, Canada jill.jacobson@queensu.ca;3. Ohio State University , Columbus, Ohio, USA;4. Queen's University , Kingston, Ontario, Canada |
| |
Abstract: | These four studies investigated G. Weary and J. A. Edwards’ (1996) hypothesis that causal uncertainty feelings serve as input to perceivers regarding the adequacy of their causal knowledge and thus determine the amount of processing accorded a given task. Participants worked on a task until they had satisfied an assigned stop rule. In three experiments, high causally uncertain people processed more information under a sufficiency of information rule and less under an enjoyment rule, whereas low causally uncertain people generally did not differentiate between the rules. In the last experiment, low causally uncertain people exhibited a similar pattern to the chronic causally uncertain individuals in the first experiments, but only after their causal uncertainty beliefs and feelings had been primed. |
| |
Keywords: | Moral dilemmas Judgement and decision making Emotions Intentionality Doctrine of the double effect |
|
|