BENCHMARKS AFFECT PERCEPTIONS OF PRIOR DISABILITY IN A STRUCTURED INTERVIEW |
| |
Authors: | Nora P. Reilly Shawn P. Bocketti Stephen A. Maser Craig L. Wennet |
| |
Affiliation: | (1) Department of Psychology, Radford University, Box 6946, Radford, VA 24142, USA |
| |
Abstract: | Though covered under the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, job candidates with a record of a disability may be adversely evaluated. Two experiments demonstrate that subtle knowledge of a prior disability creates a bias that can be removed by a structured interview. A job candidate was labeled as having once suffered from depression, substance abuse, cancer, or no disability. The candidate who once suffered from depression or substance abuse was judged more negatively than a control candidate, while a cancer survivor was not. Though disabilities are not perceived equally, benchmarked rating scales can enhance attention to relevant behaviors, thus controlling the potential for bias.We thank Steven Gregson, Michael Records and Cynthia Strickland for their help with pilot studies. Shawn Bocketti is now with IBM, Stephen Maser is with Linkage Incorporated, and Craig Wennet is with the United States Coast Guard. |
| |
Keywords: | ADA disability stigma structured ratings situational interview structured interview benchmarks depression substance abuse cancer |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|