Legitimate Political Authority and Sovereignty: Why States Cannot be the Whole Story |
| |
Authors: | Bernd Krehoff |
| |
Affiliation: | (1) Somerville College, Oxford, OX2 6HD, UK |
| |
Abstract: | States are believed to be the paradigmatic instances of legitimate political authority. But is their prominence justified? The classic concept of state sovereignty predicts the danger of a fatal deadlock among conflicting authorities unless there is an ultimate authority within a given jurisdiction. This scenario is misguided because the notion of an ultimate authority is conceptually unclear. The exercise of authority is multidimensional and multiattributive, and to understand the relations among authorities we need to analyse this complexity into its different aspects. Instead of ultimate authorities we can have actors endowed with superior authority over others in one regard, but not necessarily in another. And this limited superiority is sufficient for resolving conflicts. There is no need for ultimate authorities. Having discarded the notion of sovereignty we can embrace a different conception of legitimate authority, one that is not interested in the pedigree of actors, but in their capacity to serve its subjects. If states wish to retain their central role in the domain of political authority, they will have to earn it. |
| |
Keywords: | Legitimacy Authority Sovereignty States International organisations Joseph Raz |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|