On the deification of Confucius |
| |
Authors: | Nicholas F. Gier |
| |
Affiliation: | Department of Philosophy , University of Idaho , Moscow, ID, 83843, USA |
| |
Abstract: | In contrast to Krishna, Gautama, and Jesus, who were deified early by their devotees, the elevation of Confucius came much later in the development of Confucianism. Even here, as Section I of the paper demonstrates, most Confucian philosophers saw him only as a great sage. In their recent book Thinking Through Confucius, Roger Ames and David Hall make the claim that tradition and specific texts demand that Confucius be considered a deity. The two texts, neither from Confucius himself, involve, as I show in Section II, a mistranslation in the first and a misreading of figurative language in the second. Ames and Hall's case is not only weak, but also puzzling, because they argue vigorously for a fully naturalised interpretation of T'ien that makes a traditional concept of God impossible. Section III contains a discussion of the Confucian triad of heaven, humans, and earth, in which humans are not deified and gods are not humanised. I contend that Christian and Indian incarnational theologies upset the balance of this cosmic harmony. |
| |
Keywords: | |
|
|