Auditory instructional cues benefit unimanual and bimanual drawing in Parkinson's disease patients |
| |
Authors: | Ringenbach Shannon D R van Gemmert Arend W A Shill Holly A Stelmach George E |
| |
Affiliation: | a Program of Kinesiology, Arizona State University, P.O. Box 870701, Tempe, AZ 85287-0701, USA b Dept. of Kinesiology, Louisiana State University, 112 HP Long Fieldhouse, Baton Rouge, LA 70803, USA c Cleo Roberts Center of Clinical Research, Sun Health Research Institute, Sun City, AZ 85351, USA |
| |
Abstract: | The present study investigated performance of unimanual and bimanual anti-phase and in-phase upper limb line drawing using three different types of cues. Fifteen Parkinson’s disease (PD) patients, 15 elderly, and 15 young adults drew lines away from and towards their body on a tabletop every 1000 ms for 30 s under three different cueing conditions: (1) verbal (‘up’, ‘down’); (2) auditory (high tone, low tone); (3) visual (target line switched from top to bottom). PD patients had larger and more variable amplitudes which may be related to the finding that they also produced more curvilinear movements than young and elderly adults. Consistent with previous research, when compared to the elderly and young adult group PD patients produced a mean relative phase which deviated more from the instructed coordination modes and they showed larger variability of relative phase in bimanual coordination, especially in anti-phase conditions. For all groups, auditory and verbal cues resulted in lower coefficient of variance of cycle time, lower variability of amplitude and lower variability of relative phase than visual cues. The benefit of auditory cues may be related to the timing nature of the task or factors related to the auditory cues (e.g., reduced attentional demands, more kinesthetic focus). |
| |
Keywords: | 2330 3297 |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect PubMed 等数据库收录! |
|