Thinking Outside the Disciplinary Box: a Reply to the Comments |
| |
Authors: | Adrian C. Brock |
| |
Affiliation: | 1.Independent Scholar,Bolton,UK |
| |
Abstract: | This article is a reply to the comments on my target article, “Presentism and diversity in the history of psychology” (Brock Psychological Studies, 60, 2015a). The most controversial aspect of the article by far was my views on what it is appropriate to call, “psychology” and what it is not. Having established that psychology has its origins in Europe, I refer to the efforts of psychologists from outside the Western world to construct an “indigenous psychology”. I conclude by discussing the view of Staeuble (2006) that the disciplinary order of the social sciences is “Eurocentric” in that it reflects the assumptions of the culture in which it was produced. As long as psychologists outside the Western world continue to unquestioningly adopt a disciplinary order that reflects its cultural origins in the West, and even insist on projecting it backwards onto their own intellectual traditions, the process of indigenisation will be incomplete. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|