首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
   检索      


Random without replacement is not random: Caveat emptor
Authors:Chris Blais
Institution:(1) Department of Psychology and Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08540, USA;(2) Department of Physiology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, USA;(3) Department of Neuroscience, Center for Neuroscience and Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, USA
Abstract:The vast majority of psychology labs rely on prepackaged software applications (e.g., E-Prime) for the programming of experiments. These programs are often used for stimulus selection, and many use a selection method referred to as random without replacement. We demonstrate how random without replacement deviates from random selection, and we detail selection biases that result. We also demonstrate, in a simple experiment, how these selection biases, if left unchecked, can influence behavior. Recommendations for reducing the impact of these biases on performance when random without replacement is used are discussed.
Keywords:
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号