Further analysis of modifications to the three-step guided compliance procedure to enhance compliance among children with autism |
| |
Authors: | David A. Wilder Hallie Ertel Rachel Thomas |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. School of Behavior Analysis, Florida Institute of Technology;2. School of Behavior Analysis, Florida Institute of Technology Nemours Children's Hospital |
| |
Abstract: | Three-step guided compliance (vocal prompt, vocal plus model prompt, vocal prompt plus physical guidance) is a commonly used procedure to increase compliance among children with intellectual disabilities. Previous research has suggested that under some conditions, slight modifications to the three-step procedure may enhance its effectiveness. These modifications include omitting the model prompt and decreasing the interprompt interval. In the current study, we evaluated another modification to the procedure: the delivery of a high-preference item contingent upon compliance with the first vocal prompt (i.e., differential reinforcement). For 2 participants with autism, compliance remained low when we implemented differential reinforcement and the guided compliance procedure in isolation. However, compliance improved when we combined differential reinforcement and the three-step guided procedure, suggesting that for at least some children, the combination of contingent access to a high-preference item and the guided compliance procedure is more effective than either intervention alone. |
| |
Keywords: | compliance differential reinforcement noncompliance three-step guided compliance |
|
|